I am changing suppliers must the product passport be adjusted
Yes, if the other supplier provides different components or data
A change of supplier requires checking the product passport, and often updating it. The product passport describes a specific product with specific characteristics: materials, origin, composition, and the data associated with it. If a new supplier provides a component with a different composition, a different material, or a different origin, the information in the existing passport no longer matches what is actually in the product. If the new supplier delivers exactly the same component with exactly the same specifications, there is no material change to the product — but that must genuinely be the case, and not merely "comparable" or "equivalent".
For whom this applies, and for which changes it does not
This applies to any manufacturer or importer who sources a component, raw material, or module from a different party than previously, and who processes that component into a product for which a digital product passport is mandatory. It applies not only to a complete switch to a different supplier, but also when the same supplier begins supplying a different type of component, or a component from a different factory. The distinction lies in whether the product itself changes, not in who sends the invoice. A supplier change that is purely administrative — the same specifications, the same origin, only a different name on the invoice — does not in principle affect the content of the passport. If the supplier changes within an ongoing production process by batch, the distinction between "still the same specifications" and "actually something different" is something to monitor carefully, precisely because that difference may seem small at first glance.
Anyone using components from different suppliers simultaneously for one product recognises a comparable issue: I use multiple suppliers for the same component how does the passport work in that case sets out how that relates to one passport per product.
From when this becomes relevant, and what applies until then
This question becomes current once the digital product passport for the relevant product group becomes mandatory — the date for this differs by product group and is set by delegated act for each product group. For products already subject to a requirement, the duty of care in a supplier change applies from the moment the change takes place: the passport must represent the current state of the product, not the state at the time the passport was originally drawn up. For products for which the requirement has not yet entered into force, a supplier change is now mainly something to record and document, so that when the passport does become mandatory, it is clear which data belong to which version of the product. Which product groups are addressed when is described on when does the product passport become mandatory for products.
How to approach this in practice
First answer the question of whether the new component is identical to the old one, on the points listed in the passport — material, composition, origin, and any certifications tied to a specific factory or process. If the answer is no, the next step is to ask the new supplier for the same type of data that were requested before, so that the passport can be updated with the correct, current information. What data exactly that is depends on the product group and the component, and is described on which data must I request from my product supplier. If that data does not come forward, or if the new supplier remains vague about origin or composition, then my supplier does not supply the data — what can I do offers an approach to take this further.
After that, it is advisable not to simply adopt the data received, but to verify it against what is actually in the product — a check that also remains worthwhile in a long-standing, trusted supplier relationship, and for which how do I check whether the data from my supplier are correct provides a starting point. If you want to establish this approach for the future, so that a next supplier change does not require improvisation again, you can include the delivery of data in your procurement contract with the new supplier; how do I record the delivery of passport data in my procurement contract describes what that could look like. If the change involves a supplier from outside the EU, the role of importer is added on top of that, with its own responsibility for the accuracy of the data — see what does the product passport mean if I import products from outside the European Union.
Where that is stated: articles 9, 10, 29 and 38 of the ESPR
Article 9 of the ESPR (Regulation (EU) 2024/1781) describes the digital product passport as a link between a product and the data that belongs to it; if the product changes — for example due to a different component — then what the passport should correctly display also changes. Article 10 of the ESPR describes the requirements that the passport must meet, including that the information reflects the characteristics of the specific product. Article 29 of the ESPR regulates the obligations of importers, which is relevant once the new supplier is located outside the EU. Article 38 of the ESPR concerns the requirements for actors in the supply chain, and thus directly affects the situation where a link in that chain — the supplier — is replaced.
If you are facing this question at the moment, it is advisable to first establish whether the new component is really identical to the old one on the points that the passport describes, and otherwise request the necessary data from the new supplier before the product continues further down the chain.
Where this is based on
- Regulation (EU) 2024/1781 (ESPR), Article 10 (requirements for the digital product passport)
- Regulation (EU) 2024/1781 (ESPR), article 9 (digital product passport)
- Regulation (EU) 2024/1781 (ESPR), Article 38 (requirements for actors in the supply chain)
- Regulation (EU) 2024/1781 (ESPR), Article 29 (obligations of importers)
The regulation itself is on EUR-Lex. We provide references for each claim; you do not have to take our word for it.
What you must do concretely
What is expected of you
A supplier change is not automatically a passport change, but in most cases something does change in the data that appears in the passport. The passport describes the specific product as it is placed on the market, and a different component, a different manufacturer of a component or a different origin can mean that the underlying data no longer match.
Check whether the product itself changes
The first step is not legal but factual: is the product you sell after the change still the same product? Article 9 of the ESPR (Regulation (EU) 2024/1781) links the passport to the product as it is placed on the market, including the characteristics that are relevant to the requirements of the delegated regulation for the product group concerned. If a material, a composition, a country of origin of a component, or a property that appears in the passport changes, then in practice there is a matter of changed information that must be reflected in the passport. If the product remains functionally and materially identical and only the party supplying it changes, there is a greater chance that the existing data will largely remain in place — but this must be checked, not assumed.
Obtain new data from the new supplier
For a company with 10 to 100 employees, a supplier change in practice means that the entire process of requesting data is repeated, even if it has already been done once with the previous supplier. Article 38 of the ESPR sets requirements for actors in the supply chain for providing information needed for the passport, but that does not mean that every supplier provides the same data in the same way. What data exactly that is and in what form is described at which data must I request from my product supplier. In the event of a change, it is advisable to ask that question again from scratch, even if the new component appears similar to the old one.
Check whether the new data are correct
New data from a new supplier are not automatically more or less reliable than the old ones. They must be reviewed in the same way before they end up in the passport. How this review is arranged in practice is described at how do I check whether the data from my supplier are correct. When switching suppliers, this is a good time to review whether the new supplier delivers the same components, materials and properties as described in the specification that was requested from the old supplier, or whether there are differences that are not immediately apparent.
Document what has been changed and when
Article 10 of the ESPR sets requirements for the management and currency of information in the digital product passport. This directly concerns a supplier switch: if the passport no longer matches the delivered product after the switch, a discrepancy arises between what the passport states and what is actually in the product. For a company, this means that the switch is a documentation moment — not only "we have switched to supplier B", but also when this happened, for which products or product series, and which data was adjusted as a result.
Importers with an additional point of attention
Whoever imports products from outside the EU and switches suppliers faces an additional layer. Article 29 of the ESPR describes obligations for importers, including checking whether the manufacturer has prepared the required information and the passport. If the supplier from outside the EU changes, the person acting as the manufacturer in that chain often changes too, and with it, who is responsible for the passport. What this means in practice is explained at what does the product passport mean if I import products from outside the EU.
Where things go wrong in practice
A common situation is that a company replaces a supplier for exactly the same component, assumes that nothing changes, and leaves the passport unchanged — while the new supplier uses a slightly different composition or a different country of origin.
Another situation arises when the new supplier does not deliver the requested data on time or in full, as a result of which the passport remains on outdated information while the product has already been switched in reality.
Also difficult: a company switches suppliers for one component within a composite product, but forgets that this component falls under a different product group than the rest — a situation that is addressed at my supplier delivers components from different product groups — how do I handle that.
Furthermore, it happens that a company temporarily works with two suppliers during the transition — the old one for delivery of existing stock, the new one for new production — without it being clear which passport belongs to which batch.
Finally, it goes wrong when agreements with the old supplier about data delivery silently expire at the switch, without comparable agreements being made with the new supplier.
What you can document
- An overview of which products or product series have been affected by the supplier switch, with the date of the switch.
- The specification that was submitted to the new supplier, and whether this differs from the specification that applied to the old supplier.
- The new data received, including the way in which it has been checked for accuracy.
- Contractual agreements with the new supplier on continued provision of data, as described at how do I record the delivery of passport data in my procurement contract.
- A note on any overlap period during which products from the old and new supplier are in circulation at the same time, with a link showing which passport belongs to which batch.
- If applicable: a confidentiality agreement with the new supplier regarding the data shared for the passport, see can I request a confidentiality agreement from my supplier regarding passport data.
This is not legal advice. This page provides general information about the regulations that this platform concerns. We do not know your situation. If you are in doubt about your own case, consult a lawyer or the competent supervisory authority.
Written with AI based on the sources above, reviewed by a human on 2026-09-05. Is something incorrect? Let us know — corrections are given priority.