prodpas.eu

Which product category does my product fall under?

The ESPR designates product groups separately

Which product group a product falls under is not specified in the ESPR itself, but is determined separately for each product group in a separate delegated act. The ESPR (Regulation (EU) 2024/1781) is a framework regulation: it describes the definition of a product (Article 2) and the way in which the European Commission chooses which product groups are first in line (Article 18), but does not itself contain a list of product groups and associated requirements. Those requirements — and with them also the precise delimitation of the product group, with descriptions, exceptions and sometimes linked product codes — each appear in their own delegated act per product group. As long as such an act does not yet exist for a particular category of products, there is also no sharply defined "product group" in the sense of the digital product passport for that category.

For which products and which not

Article 2 of the ESPR provides the general definition of "product": a physical good that is or has been placed on the market. This broad definition serves as the starting point for all product groups that will later be designated, but in itself says nothing about the division into a specific group. That division only becomes concrete once the Commission, through the process of Article 18, selects a product group and draws up a delegated act for it. For products for which no delegated act yet exists, there is therefore no established product group to fall under — those products are in fact waiting their turn within the work plan that the Commission draws up on the basis of Article 18 and reviews periodically. That work plan determines which product groups receive priority, based on criteria such as the environmental impact of the group and the improvement potential associated with it.

No fixed date per product group yet

There is no overarching date on which "all" product groups are established at the same time or on which it becomes clear for each product under which group it falls. Article 18 describes the process of prioritisation and planning, whereby the Commission designates product groups step by step and draws up its own delegated act for each one. This means that the date on which a specific product group becomes concrete — with its own requirements, scope and information obligations — differs per group and depends on the pace at which those delegated acts are adopted. Until the moment that a delegated act has been adopted for a particular product group, no passport obligations apply to products in that group on the basis of the ESPR. What is certain is that this process operates through a work plan and that prioritisation takes place on the basis of the criteria in Article 18.

Mapping the product group

If you want to know which product group a product will fall under, start by checking whether a delegated act has already been established or is in preparation for the sector to which the product belongs — this can be found in the work plan that the Commission draws up on the basis of Article 18. If that act exists, the scope description is set out in it: often a functional description of the product type, sometimes supplemented with codes or characteristics that determine what is and is not covered. That description is decisive, not the general product definition in Article 2 — the latter is merely the starting point for establishing whether something is a "product" within the meaning of the ESPR at all. If there is no delegated act yet for the sector in question, the next logical step is to check whether that sector is already included in the work plan as an upcoming priority, and if so, at what stage that process is. For products that appear to fit into multiple categories — for example because a product consists of multiple components with different functions — the scope text of the relevant delegated act usually provides a point of reference via the main function of the product, although the exact interpretation of that remains dependent on the text of that specific act.

The basis: Article 18 and Article 2

This classification follows directly from the structure of the ESPR. Article 2 (Regulation (EU) 2024/1781) establishes the general definition of "product", which serves as the basis for each product group that will be designated later. Article 18 (Regulation (EU) 2024/1781) describes the prioritisation and planning mechanism by which the Commission determines which product groups are addressed when, and on the basis of which criteria that choice is made. Together, these two articles show that the ESPR is a framework regulation: the actual, product group-specific implementation — including the precise delimitation of what is and is not part of a group — follows from the delegated acts that are established on the basis of this framework.

What you can do now

Check whether a delegated act already exists for the sector in which the product falls or is included in the work plan, and consult the official texts of the ESPR and the associated delegated acts via EUR-Lex if in doubt. Once a delegated act for a product group enters into force, prodpas.eu can use it to compile the passport for products in that group, host it and provide it with a QR data carrier.

Where this is based on

The regulation itself is on EUR-Lex. We provide references for each claim; you do not have to take our word for it.

What you must do concretely

What is expected of you

The ESPR itself does not work with a single list stating exactly "this product belongs to that product group". The regulation provides a framework (definitions, criteria, prioritisation rules), and for each product group, a delegated act specifies exactly what falls within it and what requirements apply. For a company, this means determining its own product group is a matter of investigation, not simply looking it up in the law.

Applying the product definition from Article 2 to your own assortment

Article 2 of the ESPR defines what counts as a "product" under the regulation and which concepts are used. For a company with 10 to 100 employees, this means in practice that each item in the assortment must be tested against this definition: is it a physical product placed on the EU market, or is it a service, component, packaging or something else that falls outside the core of the definition? For companies that themselves produce components that are then incorporated into another end product, this step is not always straightforward — a component may itself fall under one product group, while the end product falls under a different group (or no group yet).

Following which product groups receive priority

Article 18 describes how the Commission prioritises product groups and schedules them for a delegated act. This is relevant because not every product group receives concrete requirements at the same time. For a company, this means monitoring this schedule is necessary to know when its own product is concretely due. A company selling electronics, textiles and furniture faces different timelines in practice, because each product group has its own delegated act and its own implementation date. How this sequence is structured is described on the page on the order in which product categories come up.

Determining whether your own product falls under the ESPR at all

Before the question "which product group" becomes relevant, there is the question of whether a product falls under the ESPR. Not every physical product is automatically in scope; the regulation targets products placed on the EU market for which ecological requirements are meaningful and achievable. A company that is uncertain whether a specific item counts or not should test this per product — the page does the digital product passport apply to my products goes deeper into that test.

Taking into account products that belong to multiple groups

Some products have characteristics of multiple product groups at the same time, or consist of components that each fall under a separate group. For a company of this size, which often makes composite products (electronics with textiles, furniture with electronic components), this is a realistic scenario. What this means in practice for classification and for possibly multiple passports per product is explained on the page my product falls into multiple groups.

Where things go wrong in practice

A few situations come up repeatedly with companies preparing for this.

Classification is made once and never reviewed afterwards. A company determines which product group it is in at the first assessment, but does not subsequently follow whether the delegated act for that group has been published or amended. Because the concrete requirements for each product group are developed separately, the content of those requirements can change without the company noticing.

Components and end products are lumped together. A manufacturer of, for example, an electrical appliance with a battery treats the whole thing as one product group, while the battery may fall under a different regime (the battery passport, for example, operates under its own regulation alongside the ESPR — see the difference between battery passport and digital product passport). This leads to an incomplete picture of what is actually needed for the whole product.

A new product model is not retested. With an assortment change — a new variant, a different material, an added electronic component — the product group classification of the old model is automatically carried over to the new one without checking whether this is still correct.

Companies wait for "the law" instead of waiting for the delegated act. Because the ESPR is a framework regulation, companies sometimes think that the concrete obligations follow directly from the ESPR text. In practice, it is the delegated act per product group that contains the actual requirements, data elements and data. What a delegated act is exactly and why it is decisive is explained on the page what is a delegated act.

Composite products (such as an e-bike) are treated as one simple case. An e-bike consists of a frame, a battery, electronics and more — components that in principle can each fall under a different product group or regulation. The example of how many product passports an e-bike needs shows how this type of composite products entails multiple layers of classification.

What you can document

  • An overview per product model: which product group(s) apply, with the date on which this classification was determined and by whom.
  • A reference to the specific delegated act (if published) that applies to the product group, including version or publication date.
  • A note on composite products: which components have been assessed separately and what conclusion follows from this.
  • A fixed control point for assortment changes, at which it is re-assessed whether the product group classification is still correct.
  • A log of changes in the Commission's planning (Article 18), so that it can be tracked when a product group comes up for action.
  • Underlying reasoning why a product does or does not fall within the definition of Article 2, in case this needs to be checked later.

For companies that want to understand more broadly what this classification means for their own business operations, the page on what the ESPR changes for small and medium-sized enterprises provides an overview of the relationship between product group classification and the obligations that follow from it.

This is not legal advice. This page provides general information about the regulations that this platform concerns. We do not know your situation. If you are in doubt about your own case, consult a lawyer or the competent supervisory authority.

Written with AI on the basis of the sources above, checked by a human on 2026-08-22. Is something incorrect? Let us know — corrections are given priority.